Culture

Michio Kaku Demystifies the God Equation: The Key to Understanding The whole lot


It speaks to the impor­tance of dis­cov­er­ies in physics over the previous few gen­er­a­tions that even the dis­in­ter­est­ed lay­man has heard of the sector­’s cen­tral chal­lenge. In short, there exist two sep­a­charge sys­tems: gen­er­al rel­a­tiv­i­ty, which describes the physics of area, time, and grav­i­ty, and quan­tum mechan­ics which describes the physics of enjoyable­da­males­tal par­ti­cles like elec­trons and pho­tons. Every being applic­a­ble solely at its personal scale, one would appear to be incom­pat­i­ble with the oth­er. What the sector must convey them togeth­er is type of a “grand uni­fied the­o­ry,” a con­cept that has lengthy since labored its method into pop­u­lar cul­ture.

In the Massive Suppose video above, physi­cist Michio Kaku explains this sci­en­tif­ic quest for what he calls “the God equa­tion” in about 5 min­utes. Such an equa­tion “ought to uni­fy the fundamental con­cepts of physics.” However gen­er­al rel­a­tiv­i­ty as con­ceived by Albert Ein­stein is “primarily based on easy sur­faces,” whereas quan­tum mechan­ics is “primarily based on chop­ping issues up into par­ti­cles.”

The chal­lenge of convey­ing the 2 into con­cert has entice­ed “the nice­est minds of your entire human race,” however to no defin­i­tive avail. At this level, Kaku says, just one con­cep­tion “has sur­vived each chal­lenge: string the­o­ry, which is what I do for a liv­ing” — and which has attained a moderately excessive lev­el of pub­lic conscious­ness, if not nec­es­sar­i­ly pub­lic beneath­stand­ing.

Kaku breaks it down as fol­lows: “For those who can peer into the center of an elec­tron, you’ll see that it’s a rub­ber band: a tiny, tiny vibrat­ing string, very sim­i­lar to a gui­tar string. There’s an infi­nite num­ber of vibra­tions, and that’s the reason we now have sub­atom­ic par­ti­cles,” every vari­ety of which cor­re­sponds to a dif­fer­ent vibra­tion. “A sim­ple concept that encap­su­lates your entire uni­verse” — and, cru­cial­ly, a math­e­mat­i­cal­ly con­sis­tent one — string the­o­ry has entice­ed astute professional­po­nents and detrac­tors alike, the lat­ter object­ing to its untesta­bil­li­ty. However someday, tech­nol­o­gy could properly advance suf­fi­cient­ly to fal­si­fy it or not, and if not, the door opens to the pos­si­bil­i­ty of time machines, worm­holes, par­al­lel uni­vers­es, “issues out of The Twi­mild Zone.” A physi­cist can dream, can’t he?

For extra on this sub­ject learn Michio Kaku’s guide The God Equa­tion: The Quest for the The­o­ry of Each­factor.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Michio Kaku Explains the Physics Behind Absolute­ly Each­factor

What Is Déjà Vu? Michio Kaku Gained­ders If It’s Trig­gered by Par­al­lel Uni­vers­es

Michio Kaku & Bri­an Inexperienced Clarify String The­o­ry in a Nut­shell: Ele­gant Expla­na­tions of an Ele­gant The­o­ry

Beau­ti­ful Equa­tions: Doc­u­males­tary Explores the Beau­ty of Ein­stein & Newton’s Nice Equa­tions

Is There Life After Loss of life?: Michio Kaku, Invoice Nye, Sam Har­ris & Extra Discover One among Life’s Largest Ques­tions

Bohemi­an Grav­i­ty: String The­o­ry Explored With an A Cap­pel­la Ver­sion of Bohemi­an Rhap­sody

Primarily based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His tasks embody the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the guide The State­much less Metropolis: a Stroll by way of Twenty first-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­guide.



Related Articles

Back to top button